Under the revisions, the parties must produce
electronic files in a "reasonably usable format." When presented with
contested motions about the form of document production, arbitrators can
evaluate whether a document produced in a given format is consistent with the
form in which it is ordinarily maintained. If not, a party must state the
reasons. Arbitrators can also look at
whether the other party’s ability to use the document is impaired (i.e.
searchability, metadata, etc.). Arbitrators will have the power to order a
different format for production if warranted. In conjunction with the guidance
on e-discovery, there will also be guidance on the cost or burden of
production. FINRA intends to amend the current provision to give arbitrators
the discretion to order a different form of production if it would lessen the
cost or burden of producing electronic documents.
With regard to affirmations, which are currently provided for when a party
indicates there are no responsive documents, the amendments provided that a
party must indicate that they performed a good-faith search and indicate the
sources searched.
Publication of the rule change is expected in the Federal Register
during the week of September 16th. (Release No. 34-70419)
No comments:
Post a Comment